Editing and publicizing: part of the writing process?

2

August 28, 2008 by Tracey S. Rosenberg

Bookslut (all hail) posted a link to an interview with Helen DeWitt, who’s selling her most recent book in e-form through her own website.

The problem is, though, that seeing a book into print takes up a lot of time and energy that could be spent writing other books. Normally an advance gives one something to live on while one writes the next book; if one doesn’t have that, one is using up one’s own money, that could otherwise be used to buy time to finish a new book, to see one already written into print.

What’s confusing me here is the perspective. If we’re looking book-by-book, then yes, book B is going to take longer if you have to edit and publicize book A. (See Bookends’ post about not futzing and getting on with the next book, by the way. Very useful.)

But in order to sell book A and build your career, surely you have to take the time to edit it – sometimes drastically – and go through all your proofs to make sure no typos slipped in, and make sure your copyeditor hasn’t boofed up, and do publicity-related stuff. Otherwise, the audience for book B isn’t going to be much bigger than that for book A, and if book A isn’t edited well you might lose otherwise loyal readers.

Also, without an advance, most of us only have ‘our own money’ from non-writing jobs. And those take up an annoying amount of time, don’t you think? (I just got a call from my temp agency this morning, as it happens.) But if book A sells, then in a perfect world you not only have your advance – possibly a bigger one, since the sales numbers are increasing – but, if you get really lucky, royalties.

We don’t live in the best of all possible worlds, of course, and I know more than one author who’s gone the e-publishing route in large part because of frustration at traditional publishing channels. But if my book needs editing – which means, suggested edits that I believe will help improve the book (as opposed to ‘rewrite it in the way someone else would prefer to see the story’) – then that’s not only going to improve book A, but improve books B and beyond.

And for me, that’s time and energy worth spending.

[ETA: Helen DeWitt left a comment which clarifies what she meant when she discussed advances.]

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Editing and publicizing: part of the writing process?

  1. Helen DeWitt says:

    The point I was making was that if a publisher is not offering an advance, only publication, you are using your savings to get the book into print, rather than to buy a block of time for a new book. The fact that Book A happened to get finished before Book B doesn’t necessarily mean it is the best book to be published next; Book B (or Book C or Book D) might in fact be a better candidate.

  2. tsrosenberg says:

    Ah. That makes more sense. Thanks for clarifying!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Photo credit: Rahima Subhan

Tiny bio

I live, work, and write in Edinburgh. I travel to other places as much as I can. To contact me, email writingmostly at gmail dot com.

Books

CURRENTLY READING: The Ginseng Hunter by Jeff Talarigo.

%d bloggers like this: